Celina Jaitly’s brother refused to communicate after she sought a petition for his assistance. She is also denied access to he sons who are in Austria.

Over the last few months, actor Celina Jaitly has been making headlines for many personal battles. The actor’s petition seeking assistance for her brother, Vikrant, who was detained in the UAE, was rejected after he refused to contact her. Meanwhile, she is also embroiled in a divorce battle with her husband, Austrian hotelier Peter Haag. A few days ago, she shared how, despite joint custody arrangements and subsisting orders of the Austrian Family Court, she is denied communication with her children.

Celina prays for reunion with her brother and children
On Wednesday, Celina took to her Instagram account to share a video from her recent visit to the historic Maa Baglamukhi Temple in Himachal Pradesh to seek blessings. Celina looked visibly emotional as she folded her hands to pray near the deity. In the caption, she wrote, “In the Garbhagriha of Maa Baglamukhi, I placed my prayers at the feet of the Divine Mother for reunion with my brother, for reunion with my children, and for the restoration of what love and destiny should never separate. I share this sacred puja with every soul seeking Maa Baglamukhi’s blessings, protection, justice, and the strength to bring their loved ones home.”

Earlier this year, in March, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by Celina seeking help to meet her brother, Vikrant Jaitly, who is currently in detention in the United Arab Emirates. The court said the petition could not continue after learning that Vikrant Jaitly did not want to communicate with his sister and preferred to handle legal matters only after consulting his wife, Charul Jaitly.

Talking about her brother’s decision, she went on to add, “I cannot speculate on what my brother may have been advised or told in detention. He is extremely protective of me and has no visibility of what is happening in the outside world. Given my current circumstances, it is possible that he may have received partial information and is trying to shield me from further financial and emotional strain. In such circumstances, any decision taken by a detainee must be viewed in context.”